Credit: Shutterstock
For years, gluten has been painted as the villain behind countless digestive problems. Athletes and celebrities have sworn off it, claiming better health and performance. But a major new study published in The Lancet is flipping this narrative on its head. Turns out, gluten might not be the bad guy after all.
Researchers dug through decades of studies on non-coeliac gluten sensitivity, a condition that affects up to 15 percent of people worldwide. These folks experience real symptoms like bloating, stomach pain, and fatigue after eating bread or pasta, but they don’t have coeliac disease. That’s the serious autoimmune condition where gluten actually attacks the gut.
So if it’s not gluten, what’s really going on? Associate Professor Jessica Biesiekierski from the University of Melbourne, who led the research, says most people are actually reacting to something completely different. Often it’s FODMAPs, which are fermentable carbohydrates found in wheat and many other foods. Sometimes it’s other wheat proteins. And surprisingly, sometimes it’s just our expectations playing tricks on us.
The expectation part is fascinating. When scientists ran blind trials where people didn’t know if they were eating gluten or a fake substitute, something interesting happened. The symptoms almost vanished. Even more surprising, some people who were convinced gluten made them sick felt just as terrible when given a placebo.
This isn’t about people making things up. The symptoms are completely real. What’s happening is a complex dance between the gut and brain. When your brain thinks a certain food will cause trouble, it puts your gut on high alert. Every little sensation gets amplified into real discomfort. Scientists call this the nocebo effect, and it’s the evil twin of the placebo effect.
One landmark study proved this beautifully. When people followed a low-FODMAP diet and avoided certain fruits, vegetables, and grains, their symptoms improved. The kicker? They felt better even when researchers secretly added gluten back into their meals. Another study found that fructans, a type of carbohydrate in wheat, caused way more problems than gluten itself.
This research doesn’t apply to people with actual coeliac disease. That one percent of the population genuinely needs to avoid gluten for life. But for everyone else jumping on the gluten-free bandwagon, the real culprit is probably something else entirely.
Associate Professor Jason Tye-Din, a gastroenterologist at Royal Melbourne Hospital, says these findings should change how doctors approach treatment. Instead of immediately suggesting people go gluten-free, doctors should first rule out coeliac disease, then try a low-FODMAP diet. Only if symptoms continue should they consider eliminating gluten.
There’s a real cost to going gluten-free unnecessarily. These products are 139 percent more expensive than regular foods. They also tend to have less fiber and fewer important nutrients. Plus, cutting out entire food groups can mess with your gut bacteria and increase anxiety around eating.
The research team believes the best approach combines diet changes with psychological support. Since our thoughts and stress levels genuinely affect our physical symptoms, addressing both aspects makes sense. It’s not about dismissing people’s pain. It’s about finding what actually helps.
The bottom line? Most people who think they’re sensitive to gluten are sensitive to something else. Understanding this could save millions of people from unnecessary dietary restrictions, wasted money, and ongoing worry about what they eat.
